The Wood Products Infrastructure Assistance Program is the less publicised of the two Forest Service wood grants and, for a tribal mill, frequently the better one. Indian Tribes are explicitly eligible, awards run from 50,000 to 2 million dollars, and unlike the Wood Innovations program it carries no cost share or matching requirement at all. Its funding priority reads almost as a description of a tribal forestry operation. This page covers what it funds, who it favours, and how it sits alongside the other programs. Verified against the grants.gov listing on 8 October 2026.
Get Free Quotes 👑The grants.gov listing for the 2026 program states that there is no cost sharing or matching requirement. For anyone who has looked at the Wood Innovations program and concluded that finding a one to one non federal match puts it out of reach, this is the significant difference between the two. It removes the single requirement that most often kills an otherwise sound application, and it means the arithmetic of applying is about project merit rather than about whether you can document matching contribution at the time of submission. That alone makes it the first of the two to consider for most tribal operations.
Awards run from a minimum of 50,000 dollars to a maximum of 2 million. That upper figure is substantially above the 300,000 dollars that Wood Innovations awards in the normal case, and it moves the program into territory where a genuine mill project becomes fundable rather than merely assisted. The lower bound of 50,000 also means smaller discrete projects are in scope, so an operation that does not need two million is not thereby excluded. The number of expected awards is not published, which makes competitiveness difficult to estimate in advance.
Priority goes to entities establishing, reopening, retrofitting, expanding or improving a sawmill or other wood processing or energy facility, where the facility is located near federal or Tribal lands and procures approximately 50 percent of its raw materials from those lands. Read that again if you operate a tribal mill, because it describes the standard configuration of tribal forestry: a facility on or adjacent to tribal land processing timber drawn from that land. The reopening language is equally pointed for operations that have had milling capacity idle, which describes several in Arizona and New Mexico.
Indian Tribes appear in the eligible applicant list alongside for profit entities, state and local governments, school districts, communities, nonprofits, institutions of higher education and special purpose districts. As with Wood Innovations, tribal eligibility is explicit rather than inferred, which is worth knowing because award histories across Forest Service programs skew heavily toward universities and established companies and it is easy to assume otherwise. A tribally owned enterprise, a tribal government department or a qualifying business entity can all be in frame depending on how the project is structured.
The grants.gov summary does not set out allowable costs, whether equipment is eligible, or whether mobile equipment is excluded as it is under Wood Innovations. Those details sit in the notice of funding opportunity instructions document attached to the listing, and they must be read before you plan a purchase around this program. Do not assume the Wood Innovations mobile equipment exclusion carries across, and do not assume it does not. Download the instructions from the listing and check, because that single question determines whether a yard machine can sit inside the application at all.
The 2026 opportunity closed on 22 April 2026, the same date as the Wood Innovations round. Both programs run on annual cycles tied to the fiscal year, so the practical planning assumption is a spring deadline with the notice published in the preceding winter. For an operation that wants to be ready, the preparation that pays off is the project design and the supporting documentation about raw material sourcing, since the 50 percent threshold from federal or tribal lands is a priority criterion you will need to evidence rather than assert.
On the figures that matter to a tribal mill, this program is the stronger of the two. No match against a one to one requirement. Two million dollars against three hundred thousand. A funding priority that explicitly favours facilities near tribal lands sourcing from them. Wood Innovations has the longer history and the broader remit around market development and wood construction, and remains the right fit for projects aimed at building demand rather than capacity. But for a mill that needs plant, the infrastructure program is where to look first.
The priority criterion turns on procuring approximately 50 percent of raw materials from federal or Tribal lands, and that is a claim you will have to evidence rather than assert. For an operation drawing from tribal forest the documentation usually exists already in timber sale contracts, scaling records and log yard receipts, but it is rarely assembled in a form an application can use. Pulling together two or three years of sourcing records showing volume by origin is work worth doing before a notice appears, because it is slow to reconstruct under deadline and it is the difference between meeting a priority criterion on paper and merely claiming it. The same records strengthen a loan application, so the effort is not single use.
Whatever these programs fund, the machines that move material around a yard are a separate question. If the infrastructure program follows the Wood Innovations approach and excludes mobile equipment, your forklift comes through a guaranteed loan regardless of how the grant application goes. That is not a problem so much as a sequence: the grant builds or restores the plant, the loan buys the equipment that keeps it fed. Planning both together produces a more coherent application than treating them separately.
Compare quotes from trusted dealers. No obligation, no pressure.
A forklift specialist will reach out shortly with your free quotes.
No. The grants.gov listing for the 2026 program states there is no cost sharing or matching requirement. This is the main practical difference from the Wood Innovations program, which requires a one to one non federal match documented with third party letters at application.
Awards range from a minimum of 50,000 dollars to a maximum of 2 million. The upper figure is well above the 300,000 dollars typical of Wood Innovations awards, which puts genuine mill projects within reach rather than only partial assistance. The expected number of awards is not published.
Yes, explicitly. Indian Tribes are listed among eligible applicants alongside for profit entities, state and local governments, school districts, communities, nonprofits, institutions of higher education and special purpose districts.
Entities establishing, reopening, retrofitting, expanding or improving a sawmill or other wood processing or energy facility, where that facility is near federal or Tribal lands and procures approximately 50 percent of its raw materials from those lands. For a tribal mill drawing timber from tribal forest, that is a direct description of the operation.
The grants.gov summary does not say, and the answer sits in the notice of funding opportunity instructions attached to the listing. Do not assume the Wood Innovations mobile equipment exclusion applies here, and do not assume it does not. Download and read the instructions before planning a purchase around this program.
The 2026 round closed on 22 April 2026. Both Forest Service wood programs run annual cycles tied to the fiscal year, so expect a spring deadline with the notice published the preceding winter. Preparation worth doing early is the documentation evidencing that roughly half your raw material comes from federal or tribal lands.